http://rajdeepandjoyeeta.com/bail-applications-to-be-disposed-of-normally-within-one-week/ WebEX-CAPT. HARISH UPPAL — Appellant. Vs. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND ANOTHER — Respondent. Decided on : 17-12-2002. Advocates Act, 1961 – Section 30, Section 34, …
Common Cause, A Registered Society And Others v. Union Of
Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal V. Union Of India – Whether The Lawyers Have A Right To Strike. This is a landmark judgment in which the court has stated that lawyers have no right to strike or give a call for the boycott of court. JUDGES: Justice S.N. Variava, Justice Doraiswamy Raju, Justice D.M. Dharmadhikari. See more The Supreme Court of India concluded that the strike by an advocate is considered unlawful and illicit. A strike might be allowed in the most extraordinary of the uncommon situations where respectability, … See more The Constitution of India: 1. Article 226: Powers given to the court to issue writs. 2. Article 145: defines the rules of court. The Advocates Act: 1. Section 7: Functions of the Bar Council of … See more Web5 hours ago · 3. Imposing inadequate sentence due to sympathy will undermine public confidence in legal system: Supreme Court. Case Title: State of Punjab v.Dil Bahadur. A Division Bench of Justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar held that the quantum of punishment in a given case must depend upon the seriousness of the crime, and … peter blanchette building inspector
Ex Capt. Harish Uppal Vs Union of India Case - YouTube
WebJul 20, 2024 · Harish Uppal vs Union of India on 17 December, 2002 The petitioner, in this case, was an ex-army officer. In 1972 petitioner was … WebApr 21, 2011 · The decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Harris v. State, 989 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), expressly and directly conflicts with the decisions of the … WebEx-Capt. Harish Uppal v Union of India and Another [12] It is settled law that it is unprofessional as well as unbecoming for a lawyer who has accepted a brief to refuse to … stardew valley winter fishing guide