WebSupreme Court of Florida. July 16, 1981. *1311 Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Harry A. Gaines, Miami, for petitioners. ... situation which brings us the conflict arose when the Bingers were permitted to present at trial the testimony of an impeachment witness whose identity had not previously been disclosed to King Pest Control. http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.610.html
Rule 607. Who May Impeach a Witness Federal Rules of Evidence …
WebRT @namwella1961: Remember when Jim Jordan asked Ambassador Taylor such stupid questions during Trump's first impeachment hearings, that the witness laughed out loud in his face? DA Alvin Bragg is going to mop the floor with him.💙 #ProudBlue #JimJordanIsaThreatToDemocracy #GOPClownShowContinues . 12 Apr 2024 15:42:10 WebThere are three types of statements that can be used: (1) statements made by the witness under oath, such as prior trial or deposition testimony; (2) prior writings made by the witness; and (3) prior oral statements. Trial counsel should be familiar with the proper procedure or “ground rules” to impeach with a prior inconsistent statement. ioc ortho
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine
WebAug 27, 2024 · The primary authority on undisclosed witnesses is Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). In Binger, the plaintiffs called an undisclosed expert at trial to impeach the testimony of a defense expert who was disclosed more than a month prior to trial. The Florida Supreme Court set forth the test for admission of undisclosed ... WebIn Hall the first district held that a conviction for petit theft may not be used for impeachment purposes unless the prosecution demonstrates that the crime involved some element of deceit, untruthfulness, or falsification bearing upon the witness' capacity to testify truthfully.[1] Subsection 90.610(1), Florida Statutes (1981), reads: WebHere are some basic points about impeachment: 1. Stop and think whether it’s worth doing at all. People say inconsistent things all the time. Not every little thing is important. Don’t eat up precious time and patience trying to impeach a witness over something that’s basically meaningless. It’s easy to look petty or lose the jury’s ... ioco pty ltd